Followers

18 December 2009

HT Redstate - Conservative Republican Participation


Conservative Republican Participation


All - I commend to you this very important piece by one of the most important conservatives in the country. One thing I’ve always admired about Morton is that he is an unimpeachable movement conservative who at the same time remains an amazingly effective Republican Party official.
Morton’s observations, advice, and counsel for Republicans are absolutely spot-on.  -Krempasky

Events of the past year should persuade every serious conservative that the Republican Party is the only practical party vehicle for us.

For a year now, we have seen how much damage the left would do to America if they get their way.

We should have no doubt now as to the disasters the left would create if conservatives, angry with terrible mistakes of many Republican politicians, say, “I hate the Republicans. Let the leftist Democrats win and take all power in the country for awhile. So what?”

We know what the leftists want if they obtain all power. They are statists as ambitious for total power as Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Without effective opposition, they would go as far as Hugo Chavez wants to go.

They are on the brink of destroying the system of checks and balances and separation of powers so wisely established by America’s founding fathers.

Their agenda would ruin our country for the foreseeable future, surely beyond our ability to recover in our lifetimes.

Now is not the time for us to take our marbles and go home.

Now is the time for all good conservatives to work together whenever we can to promote conservative principles successfully through the Republican Party.

The time is ripe for this because non-conservative Republicans have lost so many elections that, for instance in the House of Representatives, they have an almost negligible presence in public office. Let’s build a new majority party which opportunists cannot cripple again by selling out conservative principles.

Here are two fundamental objectives:

1.  To nominate and elect to public office a greater number of principled conservative Republicans.

2.  To advance a greater number of principled conservatives to positions of Republican Party leadership at the local, state, and national levels.

To achieve these objectives, conservatives must develop systematic strategies to achieve the following fourteen types of actions:

1.  Identify early, groom, and recruit principled conservatives to run for public office and manage campaigns.

2.  Focus conservative time, talent, and money on candidates who, if nominated and elected, will actively lead for conservative principles.

3.  Unite in a timely fashion to reduce the number of Republican nomination contests which pit multiple conservative candidates against a single content-free candidate.

4.  Increase the number of conservatives who actively participate, through contributions and personal activism, in behalf of conservative candidates in Republican nomination contests.

5.   Defeat in nomination contests a sufficient number of content-free Republican incumbents and candidates for open seats so that even non-conservatives will conclude that they must at least behave as conservatives if they wish to succeed in politics.

6.  Identify and recruit dedicated conservatives who are willing to spend the time and money necessary to rise within the Republican Party structure.

This can best be achieved by making widely known the duty of solid conservatives to take positions of responsibility in the Republican Party.

Yes, leadership in party organizations necessarily includes associating with people who hold different principles or none at all.

But when sufficient numbers of conservatives fail to participate personally in party activities, opportunists and liberals dominate the party organizations.

7.  Learn better how to distinguish between principled conservatives and opportunists who feign conservative principles in order to achieve power.

Never fully trust anyone who has not stuck with conservative principles in what appeared to be losing battles.

8.  Change the behavior of national Republican committees (including the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee, and others) which generally tend to support content-free Republican candidates rather than conservative candidates for party nominations.

9.  Change the behavior of national Republican committees, those listed above andthe Republican National Committee, which often direct party resources specially into the general election campaigns of so-called “moderate” party nominees rather than to the campaigns of principled conservative nominees.

10.  Defeat the ambition of too many elected Republicans to subordinate to their complete control the Republican party committees in the state, district, or locality where those public officials are elected.

11.  Identify and ostracize incompetent political consultants who greedily attempt to direct party and campaign spending into commissionable advertising expenditures rather than into a budget balanced as to paid advertising and vital but non-commissionable grassroots organization.

12.  Get leaders of conservative organizations to persuade their groups’ members and supporters to participate personally in Republican Party committees, in Republican nomination contests, and in general election campaigns.

13.  Get major conservative communicators (print, broadcast, and online) to urge their readers, listeners, and viewers to participate personally in Republican Party committees, in Republican nomination contests, and in general election campaigns.

14.  Get large numbers of conservatives to participate at the local, state, and national levels in Republican Party volunteer auxiliary organizations such as the National Federation of Republican Women, the College Republican National Committee, and the Young Republican National Federation.

Every veteran conservative activist knows so-called “moderate” Republican politicians who specialize in knifing conservative Republicans in the back. For them, party loyalty is a one-way street.

If we allow these back-stabbers to prosper politically, they will destroy any chances for the implementation of conservative principles in public policy and for the Republican Party to regain majority status.

To succeed in the long run, conservatives who are within the party structure or who seek a party nomination must accept certain obligations of party loyalty. Except in cases involving a nominee’s misbehavior as serious as child molestation or bank robbery, they must at least tacitly support the nominees of their party.

Because there is undoubtedly a double standard in these matters, conservative Republicans who actively oppose a party nominee almost always destroy any future they might have in party committees or future nomination contests.

When content-free Republicans try to get away with violating this rule of party loyalty, conservatives should make them pay and pay and pay for it.

If they are not also leaders of the party, leaders of non-partisan conservative organizations suffer no such damage. They are free to attack a party nominee because they are not bound by party loyalty. Fear of them often can keep professional politicians from straying too far from conservative principles.

Nominations should be decided by grassroots party members. Conservatives, including those active in party committees, must reject the notion that there is a divine right of incumbents to future nominations.

Party committee resources should not be expended on efforts to re-nominate incumbents, and party committee members should be free to volunteer their support to any candidate in a party nomination contest.

Are prominent conservatives ready to agree that they must take on the fourteen very difficult projects I have just suggested?

Some are.

Senator Jim DeMint heads a political action committee called the Senate Conservatives Fund (senateconservatives.com). Congressman Pat McHenry heads the House Conservatives Fund (houseconservatives.com). These PACs seek the nomination and election of conservatives only.

Sen. DeMint has joined many conservative organizational leaders in openly campaigning for the nomination of former Florida Speaker of the House Marco Rubio, a dynamic and solid conservative, over “moderate” Governor Charlie Crist in the 2010 Republican U.S. Senate primary.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee has intervened to support Crist in the party primary.

In the Congress, the Senate Steering Committee and the House Republican Study Committee have long records of effective action for conservative principles, often winning against the wishes of the official party leadership of both Houses.

These two special committees in the Congress spurred a conservative Republican revolution which produced the massive election victories of 1994.

Many conservatives through the years have invested time and money in personal participation in Republican Party activities and thereby earned membership in local, state, and national party committees. But there are too few of them, and therefore too seldom have they won leadership positions in those committees.

Certainly the conservative time, talent, and money currently applied to the Republican Party are insufficient to make it, as currently led, an always reliable supporter of conservative principles.

You may agree with me that the fourteen projects I have described are desirable elements of a strategy to make the Republican Party reliable for conservative principles, but it’s obvious that no single organization now exists, inside or outside the party, to design and implement all those projects.

If such an organization existed, the entire power of the left in politics, the media, and academia would focus, with considerable effect, on discrediting and destroying it.

So I don’t suggest creating such an organization.
The mission is too large and complex to be achieved by a centralized structure with a detailed, comprehensive plan. That is not how we nominated Barry Goldwater and nominated and elected Ronald Reagan.

There are opportunities for new organizations to be founded to work on different aspects of these problems — if competent organizational entrepreneurs will step up and if initial funding can be raised.

Organizations and leaders in the always decentralized conservative movement should review carefully all fourteen projects and take on those of them which fit in best with their own missions and capabilities.

Those who adopt and work diligently on one or more of the projects should receive the support and praise of fellow conservatives.

Those who do not should be treated accordingly.

Many citizens don’t even vote. Most others do nothing more in politics than vote. The number of political activists on all sides combined is a tiny fraction of the public.

But about 40% of Americans identify themselves as conservatives. That makes “conservative” the most popular political designation in the United States, twice as popular as “liberal” and more popular than either “Democrat” or “Republican.”

No one can be excluded from party participation, because by law U.S. political parties are open at the bottom. (See my papers “Life of the Party” and “People, Parties, and Power,” available under Resources atwww.LeadershipInstitute.com.)

Many conservatives would increase their participation in Republican Party activity if advised to do so by leaders they trust.

If individual conservatives and prominent leaders and their organizations take actions appropriate for them among the fourteen types I have listed, the resulting influx of conservative participation would change greatly for the better the composition, direction, and future of the Republican Party.

_____

Morton C. Blackwell has served as the National Committeeman of the Republican Party of Virginia since 1988.

17 December 2009

HT Gateway Pundit- Fistgate X

Thursday, December 17, 2009, 6:12 AM
Jim Hoft
(Big Warning on Content)
Yesterday, we reported that Barack Obama’s Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings and his GLSEN organization were promoting a book to children that included a pornographic image of men having sex while boy scouts looked on. The day before that we reported that Kevin Jennings’ organization GLSEN was promoting a children’s book that detailed first-graders having sex.
As founder and executive director of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) Jennings approved of and promoted several filthy sex books for children. Scott Baker from Breitbart-TV.com and Co-Host of ‘The B-Cast‘ submitted a shocking report to Gateway Pundit blog back on December 4, 2009. The report detailed the reading list promoted to 7-12 grade students by Kevin Jennings’ GLSEN organization. This material has not been reported in detail at Big Government website. Remember as you read this that Kevin Jennings is today the nation’s Safe Schools Czar.
Here again is what Scott Baker had to say about this vile material being pushed on children.
Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings was the founder, and for many years, Executive Director of an organization called the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). GLSEN started essentially as Jennings’ personal project and grew to become the culmination of his life’s work. And he was chosen by President Obama to be the nation’s Safe Schools Czar primarily because he had founded and led GLSEN (scroll for bio).
GLSEN’s stated mission is to empower gay youth in the schools and to stop harassment by other students. It encourages the formation of Gay Student Alliances and condemns the use of hateful words. GLSEN also strives to influence the educational curriculum to include materials which the group believes will increase tolerance of gay students and decrease bullying. To that end, GLSEN maintains a recommended reading list of books that it claims “furthers our mission to ensure safe schools for all students.” In other words, these are the books that GLSEN’s directors think all kids should be reading: gay kids should read them to raise their self-esteem, and straight kids should read them in order to become more aware and tolerant and stop bullying gay kids. Through GLSEN’s online ordering system, called “GLSEN BookLink,” featured prominently on their Web site, teachers can buy the books to use as required classroom assignments, or students can buy them to read on their own.
According to GLSEN’s own press releases from the period during which its recommended reading list was developed, the organization’s three areas of focus were creating “educational resources, public policy agenda, [and] student organizing programs”; in other words, the reading list (chief among its “educational resources”) was of prime importance in GLSEN’s efforts to influence the American educational system.
The list is divided into three main categories: books recommended for grades K-6; books recommended for grades 7-12; and books for teachers. (The books on the list span all genres: fiction, nonfiction, memoirs, even poetry.)
Out of curiosity to see exactly what kind of books Kevin Jennings and his organization think American students should be reading in school, our team chose a handful at random from the over 100 titles on GLSEN’s grades 7-12 list, and began reading through.
What we discovered shocked us. We were flabbergasted. Rendered speechless.
We were unprepared for what we encountered. Book after book after book contained stories and anecdotes that weren’t merely X-rated and pornographic, but which featured explicit descriptions of sex acts between pre-schoolers; stories that seemed to promote and recommend child-adult sexual relationships; stories of public masturbation, anal sex in restrooms, affairs between students and teachers, five-year-olds playing sex games, semen flying through the air. One memoir even praised becoming a prostitute as a way to increase one’s self-esteem. Above all, the books seemed to have less to do with promoting tolerance than with an unabashed attempt to indoctrinate students into a hyper-sexualized worldview.
We knew that unless we carefully documented what we were reading, the public would have a hard time accepting it. Mere descriptions on our part could not convey the emotional gut reaction one gets when seeing what Kevin Jennings wants kids to read as school assignments. So we began scanning pages from each of the books, and then made exact transcriptions of the relevant passages on each page.
For today’s report we give you another of of GLSEN’s recommended books for 7-12 graders. This book Queer 13 included a very graphic story about the rape of a 13 year-old child and anonymous sex in public bathrooms. It is very difficult to read–-
Queer 13 – Pages 43, 44 + 45
(A 13-year-old boy has a violent sexual encounter with an older man, which causes the boy to become desperate for sex, and he ends up spending the rest of the year promiscuously getting “my cock sucked and my ass fucked” by “a seemingly endless supply of dicks” belonging to older men, concluding with “I really did enjoy those sexual encounters.”)
One day, on the bus to shop class, this ugly fuck of a man sat behind me and put his foot in the crack of my seat. He was skinny, with a patchy, pencil-thin mustache that besotted his oily face. I ignored him for most of the trip. I did notice that he changed buses when I did, but this time he sat beside me. He tried a little small talk, but then he suddenly and very nervously put his hand on my crotch. It never occurred to me to tell him not to. I’m not sure if I agreed to it or not, but he managed to get me to follow him to a nearby rest room at another secondary school “to play.” In the bathroom stall, lit by two scant rows of fluorescent lights, half of them burnt-out or flickering, he tried to kiss me, but I was too nauseated to do that. He sucked my nipples and played with my cock. I had no idea what to do. He then tried to get me to suck his. Somehow I knew this was expected of me, but I just could not put his ugly, foul-smelling penis into my mouth. When he forced it in I gagged so hard I started vomiting. Undaunted, he tried to put his cock in my ass. Thankfully, he came prematurely. He pulled up his trousers and left me in the toilet stall confused, frightened, crying, and praying to God for forgiveness of my horrible sin. I spent a good deal of time locked in the stall, trying to clean up, trying to wipe the smell of that act off with wet toilet paper, but I was doused in the stench of that man and what he had done.
This incident should have soured me on men, but it only made me more confused and needful. One day later, something accidental happened that would change my life. I discovered that at a urinal I could actually see someone else’s penis. I was ecstatic and fearful, but I wanted more. One day, at a local shopping mall, as I was trying to sneak a peek at penises in the rest rooms, a man at the urinal actually turned to me and started playing with himself. He flashed me a gold-toothed smirk and motioned for me to come over. Shocked, I zippered up and ran out, but the seeds had been laid. The whole world of rest-room sex had opened itself up to me.
Soon I was spending a great deal of time hanging out in shopping malls and cruising the rest rooms for sexual encounters. My rest-room exploits started to be a great burden on my mind. The better part of the year was spent making deals with God, asking for a sign, then ignoring and rationalizing everything I perceived to be a sign, praying for forgiveness, and being obsessed with raging hormones and a seemingly endless supply of dicks. I believed that it was all part of a test by God to see if I was a sinner. I was.
I had known before that something was up, and that I was attracted to men, but this toilet thing was a whole new realm of sin and Satan, a new level that I had never before imagined. The following years were spent praying for forgiveness and trying to purge my homosexuality through prayer and Bible study. While my classmates wondered what sex was like, content to masturbate over pinups, I was out there having my cock sucked and my ass f*cked.
Does this sound like something you want your 7th grader to read? Is this porn really appropriate for 13 year-olds?
Yesterday 12 conservative organizations sent a letter to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions demanding that Obama’s Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings be Fired. You can help out too by contacting the committee yourself here.
** And you can contact your representative or senator here and demand that Kevin Jennings be fired.

HT Gateway Pundit- China locks of oil leases in the US's backyard- Way to go Dems

Thursday, December 17, 2009, 5:36 AM
Jim Hoft
Already this year Democrats have scrapped oil and gas leases in Utah, permanently banned drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), and nixed offshore drilling.

In fact, for decades Democrats have blocked efforts to responsibly develop this nation’s energy resources, transforming vast areas of opportunity into “The No Zone.”
This year as democrats continue their attacks on American energy producers and the economy, China has been gobbling up reserves in Canada and the Gulf of Mexico.
the Institute for Energy Research reported this news, via Energy Tomorrow blog:
Not only is China investing in places like Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Venezuela, and Argentina, but it is in the U.S.’s backyard, looking towards usurping the U.S. supply of Canadian oil sands. China is a good customer for Canada, as Canada fears that the U.S. may introduce a low carbon fuel standard[ii] or other legislation that would restrict our purchases of oil sands from Canada[iii]. China is also looking at a possible purchase of leases in the Gulf of Mexico where Devon Energy is looking to sell its U.S. leases.[iv] The sale of these offshore leases requires the approval of the Mineral Management Service in the U.S. Department of Interior. China is willing and able to be at the forefront of any misstep other countries make to gain a foothold and secure oil and gas supplies, and the U.S. seems to be giving it elbow room.
China is also investing in oil and natural gas pipelines to ensure access to its investments and to divert some of its oil imports from the Middle East away from the Straits of Malacca. Oil pipelines are being built from Russia, Kazakhstan, and the coast of Myanmar. [v] A natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan should be operating in the near future, and several liquefied natural gas terminals are either operating or are expected to be operating shortly.[vi]
While the Bush Administration initiated steps to bring on new leases of oil and gas, both offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and on public lands that are endowed with billions of barrels of shale oil, the Obama Administration has slowed the progress by extending the comment periods and providing other obstacles. Examples include:
  • ** On February 4th, shortly after his Senate confirmation, Interior Secretary Salazar rescinded 77 oil and gas leases in Utah that could cost American taxpayers millions in lost lease bids, production royalties, new jobs, and the energy needed to offset rising imports of oil and gas.[xv]
    ** On February 10th, Secretary Salazar delayed for 6 months the development of the new 5-year leasing program for offshore drilling that would have set the framework for accessing newly available areas.[xvi]
    ** On February 25th, Secretary Salazar canceled a new round of commercial-scale oil shale research, demonstration, and development leases in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah.[xvii]
    ** On February 26th, President Obama introduced a budget that contains page after page of taxes on oil and gas totaling more than $31 billion that will reduce our domestic energy production.[xviii]
    ** On March 30th, President Obama signed the Omnibus Public Lands Management Act into law, prohibiting energy production on over 3 million acres of federal land.[xix]
    ** On October 8th, after rescinding 77 Utah oil and gas leases in February, Salazar announces he will lease 17 of them.[xx]
    ** On October 20th, after canceling a new round of commercial-scale oil shale research, demonstration, and development leases last February, Salazar issued a new oil shale leasing program that decreases lease acreage by 87 percent, demands unrealistic timelines for investment into cutting edge research, and leaves royalty rates at the whim of the Secretary or in new regulations. [xxi]
    Issues with the U.S. Renewable Strategy
The Obama Administration prefers that priority be given to offshore wind farms and wind and solar installations onshore.[xxii] (That currently produce less than 1% of US electricity consumption.) They tout that these sources of “green energy” will provide needed jobs in the U.S. However, studies[xxiii] have shown that highly-subsidized renewable energy cost consumers and taxpayers more than the alternative fossil technologies[xxiv], that their component parts are largely made in foreign countries, that the jobs are mainly for the actual site construction and thus are temporary, and that the economy would be spurred more by investments made elsewhere.
Further, most green technologies are dependent on the wind blowing or the sun shining, and thus provide a lower amount of usable energy than their fossil or nuclear counterparts. Hence, many more wind farms or solar installations will be needed to provide the same amount of energy as their fossil and nuclear counterparts. And, they will also require more land area.[xxv]
What China Knows and the U.S. Doesn’t Know
All sources are needed to ensure energy will be available for future economic growth and to reduce dependence on foreign imports. Trading foreign imports of oil for component parts of wind and solar technologies does not reach any goals to which the U.S. is aspiring. To reach reductions of greenhouse gas emissions required by H.R. 2454, or other similar legislation, either nuclear power or biomass generating technologies will be needed[xxvi], which provide greater amounts of energy than wind or solar power. That’s precisely the reason that China is investing in oil and gas resources abroad and in building power plants from hydrocarbon, nuclear, and renewable sources of energy without legal and government delays

HT Gateway Pundit- Fistgate

Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 7:10 PM
Jim Hoft
Today 12 conservative organizations sent a letter to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions demanding that Obama’s Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings be Fired.
** You can contact the committee yourself here.
jennings
Today this letter was delivered by our sister organization American Principles in Action to the offices of Senators on the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. This committee has oversight over the Department of Education which employs Kevin Jennings.
Here is the full text of the letter:
The protection of children is one goal that we can all agree on.
And presumably, it is the motivating mission behind the Department of Education’s Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools.  But the innocence of our children is threatened by the appointment of Kevin Jennings as Deputy Assistant Secretary of that office.  Through his actions and statements, Mr. Jennings has shown that he cannot be trusted with this position and should be removed from it as soon as possible.
As head of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), Mr. Jennings is on record as promoting liberal sex education and homosexual themes to children as early as Kindergarten.
Now, additional information comes to light regarding Mr. Jenning’s association with GLSEN “Fistgate” Conferences, encouraging extreme sexual practices in children as young as 14.  After objections were raised to that matter, Mr. Jennings announced that GLSEN presentations and presenters would be more closely monitored.  But then, the following such conference included the handing out of “Fisting Kits” to children. The descriptions of the use of these kits are beyond imagination.  To endorse this behavior, much less promote it, is unforgivable.
Kevin Jennings must not be allowed to continue to endanger our children.
The undersigned individuals and organizations ask the Senate Education Committee, its members and every individual Senator to demand Kevin Jennings’ resignation immediately. Our children must be protected from the extreme and dangerous practices advocated by Kevin Jennings and the organizations he has represented.
Respectfully,
Andy Blom
Executive Director
American Principles in Action
Keith Wiebe
President
American Association of Christian Schools
Mal Kline
Executive Director
Accuracy in Academia
Hector Padron
Executive Vice President
Coral Ridge Ministries
Mark Wilson
Founder and President
Federal Intercessors
Nacia Blom
Executive Director
Hawaiian Values.US
Mario Lopez
President
Hispanic Leadership Fund
Colin Hanna
President
Let Freedom Ring
Matthew Staver
Founder and Chairman
Liberty Counsel
Lewis Uhler
President
National Tax Limitation Committee
William Greene
President
RightMarch.com
Andrea Lafferty
Executive Director
Traditional Values Coalition
More… Last week Rep. Michael Burgess introduced H. Res. 966 Calling on the President and the Secretary of Education to fire Kevin Jennings from his post as “Safe Schools Czar”.
You can contact your representative or senator here and demand that Kevin Jennings be fired.

16 December 2009

HT New Litrugical Movement- Cause of Beatification of Empress Zita Opened

Sunday, December 13, 2009


Cause of Beatification of Empress Zita Opened

by Gregor Kollmorgen

Many readers will rejoice - fittingly on this Gaudete Sunday - to learn that last Thursday, 10 December 2009, the Cause of Beatification of the Servant of God Zita, last Empress of Austria and wife of Blessed Emperor Charles, was solemnly opened by His Excellency Msgr. Yves Le Saux, Bishop of Le Mans, France. The process was opened in Le Mans, and not in the Swiss diocese of Chur, where the Empress died 20 years ago in 1989 in Zizers, with the consent of Msgr. Huonder, the Bishop of Chur, and the permission of the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, because within the diocese of Le Mans is situated the Abbey of Solesmes, well known to NLM readers for its leading rôle in the early liturgical movement in the 19th century, especially regarding Gregorian chant, and which was the spiritual center of the Servant of God Zita, her home among her many exiles.


The ties of the Empress with Solesmes go back to 1909 when after studying with the Visitandine Sisters at Zangberg, Bavaria, she briefly went to study with the Benedictine nuns of the abbey of St. Cecilia of Solesmes, the female sister-abbey of St. Peter of Solesmes, likewise founded by Dom Guéranger, then in exile on the Isle of Wight in England. Her sisters Princesses Maria della Neve Adelaide, Francesca, and Maria Antonia of Bourbon-Parma were all nuns of St. Cecilia abbey. Zita herself later, in 1926, became an Oblate of St. Peter's Abbey of Solesmes. She also received a papal indult allowing her to spend three months of each year within the enclosure of St. Cecilia's abbey. All counted, the Empress spent about 1400 days at Solesmes, i.e. almost 4 years. Her intense spiritual life included, after rising each day at 5:30 a.m., praying part of the Office, hearing several daily Masses (usually three), and reciting the Rosary. If she is raised to the altars, she will also especially be the model of a wife - the deep religiosity of their marriage being exemplified by the famous words of her husband, Bl. Charles, on their wedding day: "Now we must help each other into heaven!", and significantly, their wedding day, 21 October, has already been appointed as the Feast Day of Bl. Charles - and of a widow, a concept sadly very much neglected in the modern age.

This is the official prayer to implore the Beatification of the Servant of God Zita, Empress and Queen:

God our Father, you redeemed the world by the self-abasement of your Son, our Lord Jesus Christ. He who was King became the Servant of all and gave his life as a ransom for many, therefore you have exalted him.

We ask you that your servant Zita, Empress and Queen, will be raised upon the altars of your Church. In her, you have given us a great example of faith and hope in the face of trials, and of unshakeable trust in your Divine Providence.

We beseech you that alongside her husband, the Blessed Emperor Charles, Zita will become for couples a model of married love and fidelity, and for families a guide in the ways of a truly Christian upbringing. May she who in all circumstances opened her heart to the needs of others, especially the poor and needy, be for us all an example of service and love of neighbour.

Through her intercession, grant our petition (mention here the graces you are asking for). Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

1 Pater, 3 Ave, 1 Gloria Patri

Imprimatur : 09/07/2009
† Mgr. Yves Le Saux
Bishop of Le Mans (France).


Those who have received graces through the intercession of the Servant of God, Empress Zita, should contact:

Association for the Beatification of Empress Zita
Abbaye Saint-Pierre
1, place Dom Guéranger
72300 Solesmes, France

Some images, videos and links which may be of interest:

The Servant of God and Blessed Charles on their wedding day:



The Empress on the day of her coronation as Apostolic Queen of Hungary:


Her private chapel at her exile in Québec:


A video of her funeral in Vienna, including the famous dialogue at the gate of the Capuchin Crypt:

The herald taps three time on the gate with his rod.

Capuchin friar: "Who begs entrance?"

Herold: "Her Majesty Zita, by the grace of God Empress of Austria, Apostolic Queen of Hungary, Queen of Bohemia, Dalmatia, Croatia, Slavonia, Galicia, Lodomeria and Illyria, Queen of Jerusalem etc.; Archduchess of Austria, Grand Duchess of Tuscany and Cracow, Duchess of Lorraine, Salzburg, Styria, Carinthia, Carniola and Bucovina; Grand Princesse of Transylvania, Margravine of Moravia; Duchess of Upper and Lower Silesia, Modena, Piacenza and Guastalla, of Auschwitz, Zator, Teschen, Friuli, Ragusa and Zara; Princely Countess of Habsburg and Tyrol, Kyburg, Görz and Gradisca; Princess of Trent and Brixen; Margravine of Upper and Lower Lusatia and in Istria; Countess of Hohenems, Feldkirch, Bregenz and Sonnenberg, etc.; Lady of Triest, Cattaro and in the Windic march; Grand Voivode of the Voivodeship of Serbia; née Princess Royal of Bourbon, Princess of Parma, etc."

Capuchin friar: "We know her not."

The herald knocks again.

Capuchin friar: "Who begs entrance?"

Herald: "Her Majesty Zita, Empress and Queen."

Capuchin friar: "We know her not."

The herald knocks for the third time.

Capuchin friar: "Who begs entrance?"

Herald: "Zita, a mortal, sinful woman."





This is the website if the Diocese of Le Mans for the cause, where you can listen, inter alia, to the Bishop and the Abbot Solesmes (in French): link.

And this is the website of the Association mentioned above, with a lot of biographical information, images, and videos; most of it is only in French so far: link.

Le Fleur de Lys too: Empress Zita, beatification prayer

Le Fleur de Lys too: Empress Zita, beatification prayer

15.12.09

Empress Zita, beatification prayer

...The herold taps three time on the gate with his rod.

Capuchin friar: "Who begs entrance?"

Herold: "Her Majesty Zita, by the grace of God Empress of Austria, Apostolic Queen of Hungary, Queen of Bohemia, Dalmatia, Croatia, Slavonia, Galicia, Lodomeria and Illyria, Queen of Jerusalem etc.; Archduchess of Austria, Grand Duchess of Tuscany and Cracow, Duchess of Lorraine, Salzburg, Styria, Carinthia, Carniola and Bucovina; Grand Princesse of Transylvania, Margravine of Moravia; Duchess of Upper and Lower Silesia, Modena, Piacenza and Guastalla, of Auschwitz, Zator, Teschen, Friuli, Ragusa and Zara; Princely Countess of Habsburg and Tyrol, Kyburg, Görz and Gradisca; Princess of Trent and Brixen; Margravine of Upper and Lower Lusatia and in Istria; Countess of Hohenems, Feldkirch, Bregenz and Sonnenberg, etc.; Lady of Triest, Cattaro and in the Windic march; Grand Voivode of the Voivodeship of Serbia; née Princess Royal of Bourbon, Princess of Parma, etc."

Capuchin friar: "We know her not."

The herold knocks again.

Capuchin friar: "Who begs entrance?"

Herold: "Her Majesty Zita, Empress and Queen."

Capuchin friar: "We know her not."

The herold knocks for the third time.

Capuchin friar: "Who begs entrance?"

Herold: "Zita, a mortal, sinful man..."



Prayer for asking the beatification of the Servant of God Empress Zita

God our Father, you redeemed the world by the self-abasement of your Son, our Lord Jesus Christ. He who was King became the Servant of all and gave his life as a ransom for many, therefore you have exalted him.

We ask you that your servant Zita, Empress and Queen, will be raised upon the altars of your Church. In her, you have given us a great example of faith and hope in the face of trials, and of unshakeable trust in your Divine Providence.

We beseech you that alongside her husband, the Blessed Emperor Charles, Zita will become for couples a model of married love and fidelity, and for families a guide in the ways of a truly Christian upbringing. May she who in all circumstances opened her heart to the needs of others, especially the poor and needy, be for us all an example of service and love of neighbour.

Through her intercession, grant our petition (mention here the graces you are asking for). Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

1 Pater, 3 Ave, 1 Gloria Patri

Imprimatur : 09/07/2009
† Mgr. Yves Le Saux
Bishop of Le Mans (France).

We would be grateful to those who have received graces through the intercession of the Servant of God, Empress Zita to contact:

Association for the Beatification of Empress Zita
Abbaye Saint-Pierre
1, place Dom Guéranger
72300 Solesmes, France

more: New Liturgical Movement


Saint Karl Pray For Us.

HT Hudson New York- Ground Zero mosque?



December 16, 2009 5:00 AM
by Youssef M. Ibrahim

Mosque At the World Trade Center: Muslim Renewal Or Insult Near Ground Zero

An identified group with unknown sponsors has purchased building steps away from where the WorldTrade Center once stood -- to turn it into potentially one of the largest New York City mosques.
At the moment the building, the old Burlington Coat Factory, already serves as a mini-mosque: an iron grill lifts every Friday afternoon for a little known Imam leading prayers a few yards away from where Osama Bin Laden’s airborne Islamist bombers killed nearly 3000 people back in 2001.
The Imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, told the New York Times -- which put the story on its front page Wednesday -- that he has assembled several million dollars to turn it into ‘’an Islamic center near the city’s most hallowed piece of land that would stand as one of ground zero’s more unexpected and striking neighbors.’’
The 61-year-old Imam said he paid $4.85 million for it -- in cash, records show. With 50,000 square feet of air rights and enough financing, he plans an ambitious project of $150 million, he said, akin to the Chautauqua Institution, the 92 Street Y or the Jewish Community Center.
The origins of such monies are unexplained; neither are the countries or entity advancing such huge donations. Most US mosques, including many in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx are funded directly or indirectly by Saudi Arabia the country to which 15 of the 19 hijackers who bombed the World TradeCenter belonged. The UAE, Qatar and Iran are other major sponsors across the USA.
The money trail is an important question that must be answered by the Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg with more than a bland comment by one of his spokesmen, Andrew Brent, who quipped to the Times, “If it’s legal, the building owners have a right to do what they want.”
At the moment, the location is not designated a mosque, but rather an overflow prayer space for another mosque, Al Farah, at 245 West Broadway in TriBeCa, where Imam Feisal is the spiritual leader. Call this creeping annexation. On 9/11, the Burlington building, with 80 employees in its basement, is where a piece of a plane plunged through the roof, from either Flight 11 or Flight 175 crashing into the south tower at 9:03 a.m..
One of the investors for future oncoming funds is listed as the Cordoba Initiative, defined as an ‘’interfaith group’’ - and founded by Imam Feisal. Cordoba is the name militant Muslims often invoke when they recall the glory of Muslim empire in the centuries they occupied Spain.
As a former New York Times and Wall Street Journal correspondent, and as a New York Sun columnist who covered Islamic Fundamentalism extensively overseas and in the USA, I find the facts oddly lacking. The story as reported fails to answer, and avoid asking, so many pertinent questions.
The source of money matters as a significant part of the hundreds of mosques being built and already erected in this country double up as cultural Islamic centers for distributing literature-- Islamist propaganda in fact—from Bay Ridge Brooklyn to Detroit, and for schooling growing Muslim minorities. They house Imams of unknown origin and education, many of whom do not speak a word of English but preach in Arabic and Urdu -- radical messages, it often turns out.
As a reporter familiar with the Arab communities of the USA, I doubt the faithful fork out all that money for mega mosques, and if they did, the mayor’s office should prove it, not merely accept someone’s say so. It is an established fact that a significant percentage of the mosques built in the USA in the past two decades are receiving a disproportionate amount of their funds not only from the Saudis, but also the UAE, Qatar and Iran -- all problematic Islamists activist nations. The government just discontinued work on a major Iranian-funded mosque and center in New York City, which had operated under the radar since the days of the good old Shah of Iran under the auspices of the Pahlavi Foundation, and has beenowned since 1979 by the Mullahs of Iran.
The context here is that 15 of the 19 perpetrators of the attacks -- on the very site where this new mosque shall rise -- came from Saudi Arabia.
We saw how, in the case of Major Nidal Hasan of Ft. Hood, it turned out that three of the original participants in 9/11 had listened to the same preacher Major Hasan listened to: a man with a radical violent Islamic website now operating out of Yemen to radicalize American Muslims. In such a context,knowing more about the Imam overseeing a potential multimillion mosque at the World Trade Center site is essential to the story. Nearly 3,000 people were deliberately killed there – and the New York Times is papering over what is about to be built on the site in a nice, beatific pseudo-profile of the Imamoverseeing the mosque? Limiting access to this Imam to some nice quotes, showing him nattily dressed in a suit, and describing him merely as a Sufi, is vacuous, crafted and couched in public relations spin to obscure rather than explain. ‘’What happened that day was not Islam’’ is all that the Times quotes the Imam saying -- a rather lame comment given the enormity of his ambition and the iconic status of where he wants to put his mosque.
The mayor’s office should tell us more.
Just as importantly, who Is Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf ? And what is his background? Given that much Islamist radicalism originated in mosques at the hands of imams in virtually all the terrorist attacks inAmerica and Europe -- as we found over and over again – the omission of this information is a glaring mishap.
All we get learn about the Imam in the Times story about him is some anodyne, rather anemic, focus on a man of peace. No real searching. Mayor Bloomberg’s folks need to tell us what are the Imam’s origins, where he was schooled, whether he is an immigrant, a visitor, of which country is he a citizen, and what is his philosophy, among other relevant questions.
Merely describing the man as a Sufi ‘’who follows a path of Islam focused more on spiritual wisdom than on strict ritual,’’ is far too little . After every terrorist atrocity, any number of Sufi and Muslims savants ritually come out with the hackneyed saying: ‘’Islam is a religion of peace and brotherhood.’’ Accumulated as they are, these statements are added a heap of nothing for those tens of thousands of Muslims killed by other Muslims in suicide and other bombings from Pakistan to Iraq every day.

One would hope for a follow-up story or stories, and that New York City and its citizens at least ask harder questions, rather than submit to being mislead in the interest of political correctness.


HT Gateway Pundit and Hudson New York- Mosque near Groudn Zero!!!

Mysterious Group Buys Building Next to Ground Zero For Mosque
Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 11:58 AM
Jim Hoft
9-11 planes
A mysterous Muslim group with unknown sponsors has purchased a building steps away from Ground Zero.
Hudson New York reported:
An identified group with unknown sponsors has purchased building steps away from where the WorldTrade Center once stood — to turn it into potentially one of the largest New York City mosques.
At the moment the building, the old Burlington Coat Factory, already serves as a mini-mosque: an iron grill lifts every Friday afternoon for a little known Imam leading prayers a few yards away from where Osama Bin Laden’s airborne Islamist bombers killed nearly 3000 people back in 2001.
The Imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, told the New York Times — which put the story on its front page Wednesday — that he has assembled several million dollars to turn it into ‘’an Islamic center near the city’s most hallowed piece of land that would stand as one of ground zero’s more unexpected and striking neighbors.’’
The 61-year-old Imam said he paid $4.85 million for it — in cash, records show. With 50,000 square feet of air rights and enough financing, he plans an ambitious project of $150 million, he said, akin to the Chautauqua Institution, the 92 Street Y or the Jewish Community Center.
The origins of such monies are unexplained; neither are the countries or entity advancing such huge donations. Most US mosques, including many in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx are funded directly or indirectly by Saudi Arabia the country to which 15 of the 19 hijackers who bombed the World TradeCenter belonged. The UAE, Qatar and Iran are other major sponsors across the USA.

Mulier Fortis: Photos From Gaudete Sunday...

Mulier Fortis: Photos From Gaudete Sunday...


Tuesday, 15 December 2009


Photos From Gaudete Sunday...

Earlier in the year, there was an article in The Suppository which was rather uncharitable towards His Hermeneuticalness. So many people felt rather strongly that Damian Thompson and Fr. Z ran campaigns to raise money for some rather nice vestments.

Gaudete Sunday provided the opportunity to bring the vestments out again, and we also were fortunate enough to have a High Mass on the Sunday morning, so the entire kit and caboodle got an airing!

I took photos, keen to see how the "rose" colour would look with my snazzy phone... last year, I had to use my camera phone, and the very small lens has a distorting effect on colour balance.


Posted by Mac McLernon at 15.12.09

HT FAther Z- Ember Wednesday of Advent

16 December 2009

WDTPRS - Ember Wednesday “Missa Aurea” - Collect (1962MR)

CATEGORY: ADVENT, WDTPRS — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:29 pm
Today, Ember Wednesday of Advent, those who have the use of the older, traditional Roman Missal, offer worship to God with the so-called Missa aurea, the "Golden Mass". 

There is a strong Marian overtone to today’s Mass formulary.  The Roman Station for today is St. Mary Major.  the Gospel is the Annunciation.  The illuminated missals and sacramentary of centuries past presented the Gospel or at least its initial capital letters in gold, when our nickname Missa aurea.  And the Gospel pericope begins Missus est angelus Gabriel....  It was once celebrated with a solemnity nearly approaching a feast day.  Thus, Missa aurea also refers to little dramas in medieval times in which the Annunciation was acted out.  It is thus not just "golden Mass" but "the golden sending", which of course refers to the moment in which Our Lord becomes incarnate in the womb of the Virgin and His work for our salvation begins a new phase.  Missa aurea comes to be used in the terminology of art history also for paintings of the Annunciation, which often contain dramatic elements associated with the tableaux struck in the dramatic presentations of the mystery.  Doves would be lowered and an old man would be placed in a loft wearing an alb and cope.  Angels would come vested in dalmatics.  The Arena or Scrovegni Chapel in the 13th c.  Giotto’s frescoes echo this tradition as do many paintings of the Annunciation.

The Advent Ember Days were timed to follow St. Lucy’s feast (13 Dec.).  St. Lucy was an important saint for our forebears.  Her name, derived from the world for "light", is tied to our awareness in the northern climes of the deepening darkness of our December days and that those days will soon be getting longer again.  Listen for the urgency within the threefold "command" we are issuing to the Lord (festina… ne tardaveris… impende).

COLLECT:

Festina quaesumus, Domine, ne tardaveris,
et auxilium nobis supernae virtutis impende;
ut adventus tui consolationibus subleventur,
qui in tua pietate confidunt.

This Collect, an ancient prayer found in such manuscripts as the 8th c. Liber sacramentorum Gellonensis, survived the snipping and pasting experts of Fr. Bugnini’s Consilium in a somewhat truncated form, to be prayed on 24 December in the Novus Ordo: Festina, quaesumus, ne tardaveris, Domine Iesu, ut adventus tui consolationibus subleventur, qui in tua pietate confidunt.

That form tardaveris is a perfect subjunctive of tardo, "to tarry, loiter, linger, delay", paired here with ne to form a kind of imperative.  That ne tardaveris is found in the Latin version of the Psalms. 

Impendo is "to expend, devote, employ, apply".  Pietas, when it refers to man has to do with "duty", but when applied to God, it becomes "mercy… pity".  Remember that adventus here is a genitive with tui.   Sublevo means, basically, "to lift up from beneath, to raise up, hold up, support", but it comes to mean, "to sustain, support, assist, encourage, console any one in misfortune".  The perfect way to describe this vale of tears in which we journey.

LITERAL VERSION:
Hurry, we beseech You, O Lord, tarry not,
and expend upon us the help of heavenly power;
that those who rely upon Your mercy
may be sustained by the consolations of Your Coming.

You can feel in this prayer the growing Christian sense of urgency and longing.  Advent seems to pick up speed and become more anxious for resolution as we plunge headlong into physical darkness and cold, the reminders of our inevitable appointment with death.

This oration looks simultaneously back to the Nativity of the Eternal Word made man, but also forward to the Second Coming, which gives us consolation.  Christians in the state of grace can feel great consolation at the thought of the Coming of the Lord, in history and in the time to come.  We need not be afraid when we are in the state of grace.  Therefore, the Christian always eagerly says "Come, Lord Jesus.  Maranatha.   Come."

This prayers rings with consolation.

May the Lord’s coming and promise of return console any of you who are burdened with sorrow. Many people feel at times inconsolable.

This time of year can be a annual trial of despair and sadness for so many who are alone and suffering.

In gratitude for the Lord’s promises, console others. 

Think of this as a "golden rule".

HT Verum Serum- Nebraska's military bases or healthcare- you choose, Senator Nelson

Rahm Emmanuel Holds Gun to Military Base to Force Nelson’s Vote

John on December 15, 2009
This is the most disturbing, disgusting act I’ve seen in this entire process. Rahm really is a four letter word:
According to a Senate aide, the White House is now threatening to put Nebraska’s Offutt Air Force Base on the BRAC list if Nelson doesn’t fall into line.
rahm-emanuelOffutt Air Force Base employs some 10,000 military and federal employees in Southeastern Nebraska. As our source put it, this is a “naked effort by Rahm Emanuel and the White House to extort Nelson’s vote.” They are “threatening to close a base vital to national security for what?” asked the Senate staffer.
Indeed, Offutt is the headquarters for US Strategic Command, the successor to Strategic Air Command, and not by accident. STRATCOM was located in the middle of the country for strategic reasons. Its closure would be a massive blow to the economy of the state of Nebraska, but it would also be another example of this administration playing politics with our national security.
Hey, Democrats, how you like that post-partisan administration you elected? Too bad this White House won’t show that kind of bare-knuckle toughness to Iran. But no, they reserve it for America’s military. Give us a win on health care or Strategic Command gets it.
Damn this pisses me off. I try not to get ugly and personal about political stuff, but in this case it’s a real struggle. There’s politics, there’s tough politics and then there’s just plain abuse of power for the sake of power. This falls into that third category.
Let’s see if the Washington Post devotes 1/2 the ink to this Chicago-style arm breaking that they have to Joe Lieberman’s “playing politics” in the last couple days. I’m going to guess not.

HT American Thinker- Fistgate, sexualization of American children

December 16, 2009

The Left's Corruption of Youth

By Robin of Berkeley
Warning: This article discusses the sexualization of American schoolchildren. It may be inappropriate for some readers. Discretion is advised.

When I was twenty, I fell hard and fast for a dreamy guy named Will. Handsome and hilarious, Will was the perfect boyfriend...that is, until the day he hit me.

We weren't arguing; we were just goofing around on the couch. Out of nowhere, he slapped me across the face. Though I was shocked, I somehow found the wherewithal to say, "Don't do that again."

When I got my bearings back, I demanded to know why Will hit me. He said he thought I'd like it. I discovered that the man was into some unspeakable behavior, stuff I'd never heard of before. And he had had no problems finding willing others.     

During our time together, Will put his perverse proclivities on ice. But I could see the roots of his depravity -- his contempt for people, his stinginess, and his narcissism.

Eventually, Will dumped me for another girl. Though I cried inconsolably for weeks, in retrospect, his rejection was the best (and only) gift he ever gave me. 

Looking back, I wonder why I didn't follow Will down this treacherous path. I was needy and adrift, having had no strong parental arms to guide me.    

Raised by permissive parents with Playboys on the coffee table, I was brainwashed into an anything-goes attitude about sex. Desperate for a boyfriend, I viewed free love as the road to true love.

However, those 1970s-era Playboys were relatively mild by today's standards. Will's predilections were shocking, unheard-of, totally out of bounds for the times. Even though I was young and impressionable, a voice inside me hollered, "No!"

But if I were twenty years old today, with the constant blare of extreme sex, I wonder whether I would make the same decision. Barriers erected around sexuality have continued to topple like so many dominoes all in a row.

Conservatives have been warning for years that society is sexualizing children. They even proclaimed that militant gays were initiating public school youth into their ranks.

I thought that conservatives were being paranoid and homophobic. What they asserted was ridiculous in the extreme.

And I must now admit that yet again, I was wrong.

True, the average, hardworking gay or lesbian is repulsed by the idea of degrading children. They, like straights, want children protected and safe. And like everyone else, they are preoccuppied with the mundane details of everyday life -- jobs, aging parents, and home repair.

The problem is that these are not normal times. There are extreme, militant gays who have in mind big changes for everyone else. With a key appointment, President Obama has emboldened a cabal of fanatics obsessed with the "fundamental transformation" of sexuality in America.

Through Obama's election, some of the most ferocious and unhinged inmates of the nation's radical sexual fringe have been released upon the citizenry.

This fringe doesn't want to be left alone. In fact, it will not leave you and your children alone. We're talking about a lethal combination of traits: for many, manic-depression, severe character disorders, and addictions, sexual and otherwise. 

The fusion of the three produces the most toxic of people, what I call "poisonous personalities." Empowered, they are now wrecking havoc in every place imaginable.

Corrupting the public has been on the Left's agenda for decades. Beginning in the l930s, the Frankfurt School plotted the installation of Marxism in the West. They knew that a debauched citizenry is easier to manipulate.  

The school found willing henchmen in the amoral Left, which worships at the altar of pleasure: If it feels good, do it. Their hedonism has been legitimized by a host of mad scientists, such as Drs. Wilhelm Reich and Alfred Kinsey. 

A principal architect of the sexual revolution, Kinsey purportedly falsified evidence to support his subversive theories that everyone, babies included, is hyper-sexual and bisexual.

Growing up, Obama himself was surrounded by people with no boundaries to speak of. Grandpa Stanley told lewd stories about women in front of young Barry. Stanley anointed alleged pedophile Frank Marshall Davis to be the child's mentor and tutor.  

Frankly, given Obama's early exposure, I wonder if he's desensitized to abuse. Can he see it if it's front of his eyes?  

This possible blindness may partly explain Obama's selection of Kevin Jennings as the Safe Schools Czar. Jennings, a militant gay man, has been "queering" students in Massachusetts for years.  

Jennings and his crew taught the kids about brutal sexual practices like fisting and water sports. They pressured the kids to try out sexual practices that disgusted them.

Not only were these degenerates teaching kinky sex to the young and vulnerable, but they also put the kids further into harm's way by detailing the best places to hook up.

Sexualizing and "queering" kids is a worldwide trend. The U.N. has issued a proclamation asserting that starting in grade school, children have a right to masturbate and to have orgasms.

I've lately been hearing stories from public schools across the land about kids being subjected to deviance. A friend's fifteen-year-old was disciplined after walking out in disgust when a transsexual guest speaker provided graphic details about his/her surgery. The youth -- and their parents -- have no say in the curriculum.

Many liberal teachers have no qualms about exposing their charges to decadence because they themselves are steeped in moral relativism. It's judgmental, they believe, to distinguish between wholesome and degrading sex. In their view, being polyamorous is as legitimate a lifestyle choice as uttering "I do."   

But there are also some militant gays out there who are going way beyond neutrality. They are trying to bring lost and aimless students into the gay fold.

School staff may zoom in on a particularly vulnerable youth. A teacher might imply to a molested boy that maybe he's gay. Or a counselor may suggest lesbianism to a girl being hit by her boyfriend.  

It's one thing to support a teen who believes he or she is gay. But recruiting kids not only into homosexuality, but towards dangerous and degrading behavior? Divorcing any connection between sex and love and marriage?  

There are many reasons why people like Jennings are sexualizing kids. I'm guessing that for some, it's a turn-on. Describing kinky sex in front of a bunch of minors must be a sex-addict's dream.

But there's a deeper reason: People regarded by others as deviants are trying to legitimize their behavior, to make the abnormal normal. Even though they celebrate their lifestyle, I think that deep inside they hurt. No matter how much they blame society's oppression for their self-loathing, at some level they know they're warped and broken, that the hurt comes from within, not from without.

In an age that eschews religion, they have no way to alleviate the shame, no avenue out of the sewer.

In the not-so-distant past, this nation was organized around Judeo-Christian values. Sexual deviance from the norm, especially towards children, was roundly condemned as an abomination.

And there were paths to redemption.  The sinner could cleanse his or her soul by praying for forgiveness from a merciful God.   

But with religion maligned, there is no balm for brokenness. Consequently, these deviants turn to Plan B: corrupt everyone around them. Flaunt depravity and sully others, especially unspoiled children. Increase the number of degenerates by bringing impressionable youths down into their netherworld.

Today's children are more vulnerable than ever before. With the absence of moral guideposts and strong families, children are creating virtual realities destructive to body and soul.

They exhibit themselves on Facebook and YouTube, text constantly, and remain glued to sexually charged websites, even porn. By being compulsively wired, youth are kept in a perpetual state of addiction and stimulation.  

They become easy targets for predators -- and not just the derelicts hiding in dark alleys.

The predators are those like Kevin Jennings who are corrupting children en masse. The predators are every single counselor or teacher who steers a fragile youth into a high-risk lifestyle.

These predators are being enabled by a president who is willing to put children at risk to promote his radical agenda. And why wouldn't he? Didn't the adults in his life treat him with the same utter disregard?

It boils down to this: If consenting adults choose to engage in high-risk sexual practices in the privacy of their own homes, then so be it.

But we need to send a loud and clear message to the Powers that Be: our children are not available for exploitation. In other words, keep your hands off them.

A frequent AT contributor, Robin is a psychotherapist and recovering liberal in Berkeley.